Third-party documents and public sources

Status of this page

These files were written by other people. We did not independently re-run every RPC call or audit every contract cited. Where two documents disagree, both are listed. Inclusion is not a finding that a named person committed a crime.

How to read them

Treat on-chain queries (block hash, state root, owner slot, deploy height) as checkable.
Treat motive, “theft,” “isolation behind a firewall,” and identity of keyholders as contested unless a court has ruled.
Dates matter. Several write-ups distinguish an EVM-state divergence near block 316,002 (17 February 2026 in some reports) from a later operational separation discussed around 15 July 2026.

Library

1. Community Technical Incident Report: Reconstruction of the Divergent BlockDAG Network

Reconstruction arguing rpc.bdagscan.com reflects a restored historical state plus later isolation, not a February-only natural split.

2. Chain 1404 Technical Evidence Dossier (Dawie, v4, 25 Aug 2026)

Code-and-chain rebuttal focused on genesis-wallet movement, fork height, and blocklist control.

3. Chain 1404 Evidence-Based Community Report (public draft, 24 Aug 2026)

Community RPC comparison, producer-diversity samples, and witness statements about launch custody.

4. Chain 1404 Factual Response to the Technical Evidence Dossier (26 Aug 2026)

Response arguing freeze is not seizure, EOA ≠ proven sole human control, and some isolation claims are unproved.

5. BDAG Community AMA transcripts, 18 Aug 2026 and 27 Aug 2026

Community operators describing RPC guidance, DAO plans, and their view of a divergent node.

Documents are linked out to their original hosts, not republished here, unless the operator confirms republication rights.

Our operational position

Regardless of who is right about history and motive, this pool mines and pays only under /network.